nsxt2000
10-07-2007, 11:49 PM
While attending NSXPO in Ohio I took photos of interesting auto tags. There were the usual NSXTASY, NSX-T, MYNSX, etc. along with the un-usual ENZOWHO, UR2SLOW and the likes. I noticed that in some states (Ohio being one), there is the requirement for front and rear plates, and those really do take away from the flowing front lines of the car. I guess a case could even be made that it slows the car down and decreases fuel economy, although that would have to be streaching the point. Ignoring the pros & cons of aerodynamics, a front license plate just looks ugly on a sports car.
I have a difficult time believing that a front plate serves any real purpose in traffic enforcement, and thankfully many States agree and do not require them. I own an advertising firm - now in it's 28th year I am happy to report -and one of the factories I represent is a leader in producing custom stamped aluminum plates. Each year they expend a large amount of money lobbying State legislators to maintain a "no front plate" stance. Every time a State adds that requirement it directly impacts their sales, so they have a vested interest in seeing it does not happen.
Unfortunately 3M, the company supplying almost 90% of the reflective material used on license plates, has a much larger budget pushing States to adopt a two plate policy. That is in their best financial interest and I understand the realities of economics. I just don't like them messing with something that a dedicated group of designers, engineers and wind tunnels have said is how a certain vehicle should look and they want to go and change it. Obviously their executives don't drive sports cars.
Incidentally next week check the forum for shots of the more unusual tags at NSXPO. There was a good collection to see.
-Mike S.
I have a difficult time believing that a front plate serves any real purpose in traffic enforcement, and thankfully many States agree and do not require them. I own an advertising firm - now in it's 28th year I am happy to report -and one of the factories I represent is a leader in producing custom stamped aluminum plates. Each year they expend a large amount of money lobbying State legislators to maintain a "no front plate" stance. Every time a State adds that requirement it directly impacts their sales, so they have a vested interest in seeing it does not happen.
Unfortunately 3M, the company supplying almost 90% of the reflective material used on license plates, has a much larger budget pushing States to adopt a two plate policy. That is in their best financial interest and I understand the realities of economics. I just don't like them messing with something that a dedicated group of designers, engineers and wind tunnels have said is how a certain vehicle should look and they want to go and change it. Obviously their executives don't drive sports cars.
Incidentally next week check the forum for shots of the more unusual tags at NSXPO. There was a good collection to see.
-Mike S.